Don Park

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
icecondor

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
icecondor [2008/10/03 07:05] – hadoop 192.168.0.4icecondor [2008/12/28 20:27] – 71.237.252.103
Line 1: Line 1:
-IceCondor: Open Source Location Broker+===== IceCondor: Open Source Location Broker  ===== 
 +See http://www.icecondor.com
  
 See [[icecondor:usecases]] \\ See [[icecondor:usecases]] \\
 See [[icecondor:API]] \\ See [[icecondor:API]] \\
 See [[icecondor:location]] \\ See [[icecondor:location]] \\
-See [[icecondor:androidclient]] +See [[icecondor:androidclient]] \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:news]] \\ 
 +See server [[icecondor:benchmarks]] \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:battery]] usage \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:URLs]] \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:pigeon]] \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:graphics]] \\ 
 +See [[icecondor:roadmap]] 
  
 == terms == == terms ==
Line 56: Line 64:
 Distributed. Each IceCondor installation (node) uses a distributed hash table to store location records. Nodes can be added to the network easily and once added, its data is searchable by any other node. Using a DHT for storage would loose the benefits of postGIS for lat/long queries. Hadoop? Distributed. Each IceCondor installation (node) uses a distributed hash table to store location records. Nodes can be added to the network easily and once added, its data is searchable by any other node. Using a DHT for storage would loose the benefits of postGIS for lat/long queries. Hadoop?
  
 +===== Level 2 Headline =====
  
icecondor.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/31 04:08 by 127.0.0.1