User Tools

Site Tools


bitcoin:miners

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
bitcoin:miners [2011/01/15 18:12] donpdonpbitcoin:miners [2011/02/15 17:36] donpdonp
Line 300: Line 300:
 = PS3 = = PS3 =
 <code> <code>
 +08-Jan-2011
 < ArtForz> rooted PS3 should have peak ~24.5Mhps  < ArtForz> rooted PS3 should have peak ~24.5Mhps 
 < ArtForz> = all 7 SPEs + PPE    < ArtForz> = all 7 SPEs + PPE   
Line 306: Line 307:
 = artforz bank account = = artforz bank account =
 <code> <code>
 +08-Jan-2011
 < newsham> also are you keeping a large stock of btc or liquidating most < newsham> also are you keeping a large stock of btc or liquidating most
 < ArtForz> I kept about 15% < ArtForz> I kept about 15%
Line 316: Line 318:
 = cartel / majority = = cartel / majority =
 <code> <code>
 +15-Jan-2011
 < ArtForz> once a mienr (or a bucnh of collaborating miners) get > 50%, they can claim all generation and block transactions from getting into the chain < ArtForz> once a mienr (or a bucnh of collaborating miners) get > 50%, they can claim all generation and block transactions from getting into the chain
 < molecular> on the other hand: if all the gamers start mining (some hype might happen), artforz's asics dont look so good any more < molecular> on the other hand: if all the gamers start mining (some hype might happen), artforz's asics dont look so good any more
Line 333: Line 336:
 < ArtForz> that and nobody else suddenly gets blocks < ArtForz> that and nobody else suddenly gets blocks
 </code> </code>
 +
 += ATI Driver rev =
 +<code>
 +18-jan-2011
 +ArtForz> for 5xxx, anythong >= 10.10 seems to work well
 +sipa> but it's not like the stream sdk where you shouldn't use the latest version
 +ArtForz> nah 
 +ArtForz> I run 4*5970 on 10.12 no problem
 +ArtForz> seems to be even a bit faster than 10.10 
 +ArtForz> btw, the multiGPU slowdown and CPU hogging is limited to OpenCL in sdk 2.2/2.3, CAL works fine
 </code> </code>
 +
 +<code>
 +15-feb-2011
 +<ArtForz> I mean, 6970 is pretty exactly as fast as 5870 for me
 +<retsilex> ArtForz: 6950 .. would you recommend it?  instead of 5870
 +<ArtForz> well... for 3D, yes, for mining.. no
 +<Diablo-D3> retsilex: 6xxx is useless for mining
 +<ArtForz> you need sdk2.3 for 69xx, which has broken OpenCL multigpu support
 +<Diablo-D3> retsilex: you're stuck with sdk 2.2 or 2.3, which is shit
 +<ArtForz> so unless you have a CAL miner, 69xx sucks ...
 +<Diablo-D3> retsilex: 6970 should be 15% faster than 5870
 +<Diablo-D3> but its not
 +<Diablo-D3> because the sdk fucks you over
 +<retsilex> ArtForz: your desktop uses which sdk, which drier version? and what linux?
 +<ArtForz> debian sid, 2.6.32, fglrx 10.9, sdk 2.1
 +
 +<foucist> ArtForz: i heard you were the guy to ask about the reason for the drop in stream processors between 5970 and the cards that come after :P
 +<ArtForz> foucist: pretyt simple really, 5xxx had pretty bad shader ALU use % in games on average
 +<ArtForz> so 6xxx got more fixed-function ahdrware, beefed up frontends, better mem controller, ... but shader ALU * MHz went down
 +</code>
 +
 +
bitcoin/miners.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/31 04:08 by 127.0.0.1