bitcoin:miners
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
bitcoin:miners [2011/01/08 19:31] – donpdonp | bitcoin:miners [2011/02/15 17:36] – donpdonp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 300: | Line 300: | ||
= PS3 = | = PS3 = | ||
< | < | ||
+ | 08-Jan-2011 | ||
< ArtForz> rooted PS3 should have peak ~24.5Mhps | < ArtForz> rooted PS3 should have peak ~24.5Mhps | ||
+ | < ArtForz> = all 7 SPEs + PPE | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | = artforz bank account = | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | 08-Jan-2011 | ||
+ | < newsham> also are you keeping a large stock of btc or liquidating most | ||
+ | < ArtForz> I kept about 15% | ||
+ | < ArtForz> ~40kBTC currently | ||
+ | < ArtForz> I'll probably keep on selling 80% of daily production or so | ||
+ | < molecular> | ||
+ | < ArtForz> I'd guess so | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | = cartel / majority = | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | 15-Jan-2011 | ||
+ | < ArtForz> once a mienr (or a bucnh of collaborating miners) get > 50%, they can claim all generation and block transactions from getting into the chain | ||
+ | < molecular> | ||
+ | < molecular> | ||
+ | < ArtForz> I prefer to add hashrate slowly to stay at 15-25% of total network | ||
+ | < ArtForz> it simply doesnt make much economic sense to grow beyond 33% or so | ||
+ | < ArtForz> you're effectively competing against yourself | ||
+ | < davex__> artforz: why does that matter? | ||
+ | < ArtForz> except you dont | ||
+ | < ArtForz> lets say rest of network is 100Gh/s, you add 10, you're 9.1% of total, you add 50, you're 33.3% of total | ||
+ | < newsham> what artforz is not counting on is that once he has large monopoly, he will be able to extract nice transaction fees if he so desires :) | ||
+ | < ArtForz> so ~ 3.5x payout for 5x the hardware | ||
+ | < davex__> artforz: yeah true... | ||
+ | < ArtForz> yep | ||
+ | < ArtForz> and a mining cartel is really really obvious | ||
+ | < davex__> because you get lots of simultaneous solutions submitted? | ||
+ | < ArtForz> that and nobody else suddenly gets blocks | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | = ATI Driver rev = | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | 18-jan-2011 | ||
+ | ArtForz> for 5xxx, anythong >= 10.10 seems to work well | ||
+ | sipa> but it's not like the stream sdk where you shouldn' | ||
+ | ArtForz> nah | ||
+ | ArtForz> I run 4*5970 on 10.12 no problem | ||
+ | ArtForz> seems to be even a bit faster than 10.10 | ||
+ | ArtForz> btw, the multiGPU slowdown and CPU hogging is limited to OpenCL in sdk 2.2/2.3, CAL works fine | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | 15-feb-2011 | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
bitcoin/miners.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/31 04:08 by 127.0.0.1